Bitcoin ETFs see net outflows double as optimism fades over Trump’s crypto reserve plan

The funds negotiated in exchange for Bitcoin in the United States saw their net outings almost doubled while market experts expressed concerns about the cryptography reserve plan proposed by US President Donald Trump.

According to data From Sosovalue, the 12 ETF Bitcoin recorded $ 143.43 million in net outputs on March 4 – almost double the day before the day before $ 74.19 million entries.

The FBTC and Arkb of Ark 21Shares of Fidelity experienced $ 46.08 million and $ 43.92 million, respectively. The EZBC of Franklin Templeton followed with net redemptions of $ 35.71 million. The other FNB BTCs contributing to the negative impetus included Bitb de Bitwise, BTCO of Investo Galaxy and BTCW from Wisdomtree, which recorded $ 23.96 million, $ 16.47 million and $ 13.07 million respectively.

The Mini Bitcoin Trust of Graycale has put the trend with a net influx of $ 35.77 million, helping to compensate for some of the day’s outings. The remaining five ETF BTCs saw no entry or exit.

These investment products experienced a daily negotiation volume of $ 4.55 billion on March 4, while total net entries since their launch were $ 36.72 billion.

The ether FNB come back to the entrances

The nine Ethereum returned to net entries on March 4, with $ 14.58 million Entering the funds, ending an eight -day sequence of outings.

Feth de Fidelity led the entries with $ 21.67 million, while Grayscale and Mini Bitcoin fiduciary funds recorded $ 10.71 million entries and $ 8.46 million, respectively. However, the Ibit of Blackrock stood out with $ 26.27 million out of outings. The remaining five ethors remained neutral by day.

Trump’s crypto reserve plan triggers market concerns

The push of Bitcoin ETF outings coincided with the reactions of the market to Trump weekends announcement Concerning the creation of a strategic reserve of American crypto. The proposed reserve would include a mixture of cryptographic assets, mainly Bitcoin and Ethereum, in order to position the United States as the “cryptographic capital of the world”.

Despite its ambitious objective, the plan has faced a significant decline in the cryptographic community. Critics argue that it contradicts the fundamental principle of the decentralization of Bitcoin, which raises fears that the currency designed to be free from government control can now be influenced by American policies.

Anthony Poseliano, CEO of Professional Capital Management and an important cryptographic investor, expressed his opposition. In a letter to customers, he described the plan as an error that the United States will regret.

“Even if Solana is our second largest holding of cryptography, and many of the actions I have are linked to Altcoins, I always think that this big crypto reserve is a bad idea,” wrote Poseliano. He warned that politics seems to be “a random mixture of speculative assets” who would mainly benefit initiates and token creators to the detriment of American taxpayers.

Bitcoin, which jumped 11% for an intra -day summit of $ 94,770 on Monday March 3, traced 13.8% to negotiate $ 81,700 the next day while investors adopted a risk position in the midst of trade tensions and commercial concerns concerning the feasibility of the strategic reserve plan. Ethereum also decreased, from 19% of its recent summit to $ 2,055 on March 4. However, the two cryptographic active ingredients have since recovered, with Bitcoin (BTC) up 3.6% in the last day, negotiating $ 87,163 and Ethereum (Ethn) Increase from 3.6% to $ 2,180.

Bitcoin difficulties in 2025

Uldis Teraudklans, Director of Paybis income, said Bitcoin’s difficulties this year. He noted that the price of Bitcoin had dropped up to 11.47% up to date, while gold, faced with similar economic uncertainty, won 10.65% during the same period.

Referring to a Bank of America survey, which revealed that 58% of fund managers still consider gold as a reliable value store – in particular in the event of a trade war – while only 3% of Bitcoin confidence, Teraudklans pointed out that “this year, Bitcoin proved to be more reactive to macroeconomic trends, including commercial wars and fluctuations in interest rates”. “He stressed that with the companies of Wall Street now strongly exposed to Bitcoin, the liquidity flows made him more volatile.

February was particularly difficult, Bitcoin plunging 17.39% – February since 2014 and the only negative during a post -recompress year. Teraudklans assigned this to the drop in institutional appetite, trade tensions and the growing correlation of Bitcoin with the S&P 500.

On the long -term role of Bitcoin, Teraudklans said: “Bitcoin has never been an asset in Haventé – only ambitious.” He recognized that each market cycle revives the debates on the viability of Bitcoin as a hedge, but stressed that “bitcoin has always been a risk asset, according to a long -term trajectory to become an asset at risk of security and risk”.

“It is only when Bitcoin reaches the market capitalization of gold that we can seriously assess if it can replace it as an asset in complete safety,” he concluded.