Scroll co-founder warns against L2 tariffing, calls it ‘toxic’ for Ethereum

The co-founder of Scroll, Ye Zhang, criticized the proposals to impose costs on Ethereum Rollups, arguing that they would harm the long-term growth of short-term income.

Ye Zhang, co-founder of ADDER-2 Smart Contract Platform Scroll, criticized the idea of ​​charging costs on Ethereum rolls, calling it “one of the most toxic ideas for the future of Ethereum”.

In a series of publications On X, Zhang argued that this approach would sacrifice “long -term scalability and the growth of ecosystems for short -term income”, adding that the measurement of ETH (Ethn) The value by the revenues of Ethereum “lack the point”.

According to Zhang, the strength of Ethereum is to be “the active of the hub through thousands of Rollup ecosystems”, and not in the collection of costs. Defillama data shows That after the EIP-4488 upgrade, which increased the scalability of layer 2, Ethereum costs have gone from tens of millions per day to around $ 570,000 by the end of March.

Zhang noted that although the Solana network is “integrated vertically” into its Solana (GROUND) Token like its central asset, ETH is “already the dominant asset on the basis, arbitrum, optimism, zksync, scrolling – and even where it is not the gas token (like Starknet).”

The co-founder of Scroll also warned that the charges on the Rollups could turn against him. He said it could push them to availability solutions for alternative data. This, in turn, could weaken Ethereum’s position in the ecosystem. Zhang added that if Ethereum becomes “gourmet” and begins to tax the layer-2, the network would lose “relevance while not being evolved”.

Instead of extracting the value of the rollers, Zhang suggested that Ethereum should focus on scaling and upgrading of expeditions faster. And Zhang is not the only one seems to have concerns about the rhythm of Ethereum. Like crypto.News reported Earlier, the former expert in the solidity of the Ethereum Foundation, Harikrishnan Mulackal, suggested that internal confusion could have led to frequent disagreements, with key updates would have been confronted with repeated delays in the Ethereum development community.